Welcome to AC Group

Home

More Info on ACG

Expert Witness Services

Physician Services

Physician Suite

L1 Educational Services

L2 Operational Assessment

L3 Contract Negotiations

L4 PMS/EHR Search

L5 Assessment and Search

L6 Project Oversight

L7 Post EHR Review

Hospital Services

Why Select AC Group

Option 1 – Educational Up

Option 2 -Technology Brie

Option 3 - Contract Negot

Option 4 - Product Search

Option 5 - Assess/Seach

Option 6 – Implementation

Client Comments

AC Group Clients

Client Profiles

Large Provider Clients

Small Practice Clients

Association Clients

IPA/PHO/MSO Clients

Hospital Clients

Prior Speeches

Surveys

All Healthcare Products

Why complete our surveys?

Types of Products

Short Survey

Detailed PMS/EHR Survey

FQHC Survey

CDS Survey

OB/GYN Survey

Staff BIOs

Mark R. Anderson

Lorraine Casagrande

Research

White Papers

Medical Liability

Data Conversion

Connectivity Assurance

Audio Podcasts

DRT

Provider Research Papers

Educational Handouts

Other Resorces

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Do EHRs Increase Medical Liability?
Click Image to Download Report

Whether EHRs increase overall medical liability relative to their paper-based peers is not yet known. While EHRs may reduce the medical liability for certain errors, it appears that EHRs both create new forms of medical liability and expose existing liability issues in the healthcare environment that might otherwise remain unknown.

It is critical that medico-legal issues and risks be identified and discussed openly as healthcare organizations and individual physician practices invest in and adopt EHRs. The legal landscape related to EHRs is still fluid and evolving, but important progress is being made – research is being conducted, case law is emerging, and standards are being established. The full value of EHR systems will be realized when design and implementation support physician workflow and clinical needs as well as each entity’s medico-legal needs.

A review of 65 EHRs showed that more than 90% of them did not provide adequate medico-legal training and 95% of them had specific medico-legal issues. Either could increase the potential risk of a liability claim and would hamper its defense. The EHR vendor community should strongly consider external reviews of their software for potential medico-legal issues that may have been missed by internal reviews due to employee familiarity with the process and the product.

Health Information Technology (HIT) has a history dating back almost 50 years to its origins in bioinformatics. The earliest HIT pioneers considered how best to encode and store information about patient treatment, but were limited primarily to basic science research projects or managing patients in their own institutions. Only in the last 30 years have there been an increasing number of larger corporate interests, developing products intended to reach a broader industry audience. Despite several decades of development, marketing, and sales, penetration into both the hospital and medical practice environments has been limited and fairly stable.

There are many reasons attributed to the challenge of selling a commercially viable HIT solution into healthcare organizations:

•  
inadequate involvement of end users in development (see NIST usability study)
•   high software cost
•   high cost infrastructure needed to support HIT
•   increased personnel costs during the selection and implementation stages
•   coupled with revenue reduction due to lowered productivity during those stages
•   change management challenges
•   coupled with limited education and training of stakeholders
•   poor clinician training because trainers are often not clinicians


Website powered by Network Solutions®

Your Trusted IT Advisor